| 1 2 3 »»» | |
|
Bane
|
3000 TROOPS. 1000 Archers, 500 Rangers, 150 Norman, and the rest made up of swordmeat. On Ranged and agressive. Attack a city with 2000 Troops. 1000 Archers, 200 Horse Archers, the rest made up with never ending swordmen.
There is no wall between us, he is not there as he did not try and attack me(He must be on the same Range). Three spots inbetween us( Yes three in the middle). HOW THE HELL DOES HE WASTE AWAY MOST OF THE TROOPS. one hit for me is 7swordmen one hit for him is 30 swordmen, 9 Men at Arms, and 4 Pike. It went on like this for awhile. He does not have any ranged troops i repeat no range troops. I ended up leaving with 1000 troops. I just dont get this at all, and this is not the first time this has happenned. Is it because i am not buying Gold or something and i lose double what i should so i start spending money. |
| 1 2 3 »»» | |
|
Realada
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [00:31]
|
|
Bane
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [00:39]
|
|
Realada
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [00:44]
|
|
TomiBullet
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [19:56]
Tomi
on: Nov 08 [14:33] why certain players win against me over and over again no meather how big my army is...i beleive that if those players have only 10archers and hero, i wont win even if i send 1000 troops...wtf they have what others dont iam wondering...here is result of another fight... All your troops were defeated in city Montesuma LAA. You lost: Archer 186, Marksman 136, Cart 206, Hero 1, Ranger 126, Swordsman 9. You killed: Man-at-arms 22, Marksman 47,Results of a fight in resources: not available i met this player in montesuma city(not mine, not his)... he entered into a city with 50marksman,20man-at-arms,1 hero and 100horse archers...i was there with Archer 186, Marksman 136, Cart 206, Hero 1, Ranger 126, Swordsman 9. my hero is on level 7 and has archery expert...his hero is on level 5... if u check stats of marksman, u will see that he is good against horse archers...if u check stats of archers, u will see that the only warrior he is good against is horse archer....so iam wondering, how the fuck is possible that i killed in 2shoots his marksman and 20man-at-arms and then his 100 horse archers killed all my Archer 186, Marksman 136,Hero 1, Ranger 126, Swordsman 9.... and what is even more interesting is that he did this in one single shot...one shot of his 100horse archers, 500 of my troops dead...wtf, are u joking me...and this is not the first time... now pls tell...do even exist formation, aggresion or what the fucking ever to set so 100horse archers kill 500troops of archers, marksman and rangers... |
|
TomiBullet
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [20:00]
I would like to help u here but i have same problem...some plys beat my army no meather what...i beleive that if i attack some of them with 5000ranged troops, 1000cavalry--against their 300 troops, i will probably lose...i always did and i always had at least 1,2* bigger army...setted aggresion, formation, troops itc...let me know if u find an answer on ur question lol, tc
 |
|
khzr
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [21:00]
|
|
little
|
on: 19 Nov 2009 [23:45]
updated: 19 Nov 2009 [23:55]
There is no abusing tactic now, one of the latest test shown, that one army make much more damage to 10 attacking armies.
And author shows us hole enemy army. I think he saw only 1 squad, not 50 or 100 squads of 100 archers. I think enemy had more experienced hero with archer and morale skills, which gives him advantage in shooting. And may be with defense skill too. Also I see that the author doesn't know unit abilities and can't use them in true way. Or doesn't know how to use army formations. Or he didn't give us the full picture. Also he wrote some bullshit: If there are 3 squares between armies only Normans and Catapults can take part in this battle. Normans from the author side and... nothing from the enemy. Looks strange, isn't it? 
May be author missed another enemy army? With 300-500 Normans or 1k Catapults?  |
|
Bane
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [12:01]
 Yes you are right Moderator i made it all up, because i have way too much time on my hands!!
There was no other army there apart from his main one. Reason why i know this is that i had searched around, looking for his Storeroom. 3 Spots!!!!Yes yet again, but of course it must be Bullshit!!! Yes i know the range of the troops, hence why i posted this god dam message. I was the only one with Norman Archers and Rangers, 1000 Archers, 200 Horse Archers, The rest Swordsman, Horsemen, Pikemen, Carts and his Hero.
But after the answer from LITTLE MODERATOR, this will be the last time i post on here. |
|
crimson
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [12:39]
|
|
little
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [13:21]
updated: 20 Nov 2009 [13:24]
Bane, calm down, I didn't want to offend anyone. You post contains some ambiguities.
You wrote: I think it's your army? Next:This is enemy army, right? What does this mean? And what about enemy's 1k Archers & 200 Horse Archers you've noticed above? We can't make the full picture based on contradictory information. Can you give us some battle logs? We can see attack timings from them, to find out, which troops have hurt your army. For example, Archers shoot 1 time per 10 seconds, Horse and Norman Archers - 1 per 15 sec, Marksman - 1 per 20 sec. PS: Moderators have no bonuses in the game, they just keep order on the forum. I can moderate only Russian forum section. In this section I have same permissions as yours. PPS: If you want, I can tell some words about your army formation and unit abilities. |
|
Bane
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [15:15]
I was sitting out of range(Yet again 3 spots inbetween) of his Archers!!!!!! Archers range is 3?? Horse Archers 3??
I had rangers and also Norman Archers, if i am correct their range is 4 ( Archers and rangers together, i have been told increase to 4) He did not have, apart from archers and Horse Archers, any others apart from Swordsmen, horseman and Pike. My Army: 1000 Archers, 500 Rangers, 150 Norman Archers, 200 Marksmen, The rest made up of Swordmen pike and Men at Arms. There was no other army. The reason i am Peed is this, Quote: Also he wrote some bullshit: And you are the Moderator who is supposed to keep order!!!!! |
|
Bane
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [15:20]
|
|
little
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [15:38]
|
|
khzr
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [15:43]
|
|
Bane
|
on: 20 Nov 2009 [18:22]
|
| 1 2 3 »»» | |
at that time
Yes Little he is, and dont worry about it,just cant see why on earth i lost so badly.