ok we all seem to have our own orders right? i say we all bulk togther and make 1 bigger order (english speaking players) since none of us are winning we can atleast win togther. 4-5 orders merge and we have the most powerful order on server... C'MON GUYS! (and girls???)
1
bathtubguy
on: 20 Aug 2011 [20:20]
Sure im up for it
Jake7
on: 20 Aug 2011 [21:02]
Agreed but we all need to have a vote on what order
crimson
on: 20 Aug 2011 [21:07]
Locious, alpha server is a test server... no need to be call "the most powerful order" on a test server... Its there for people to help find glitches, not to play competitively.
schnitzer90
Moderator
on: 20 Aug 2011 [22:05]
crimson Thank you for saying that, nobody seems to understand that.
What is the point in getting 20 cities? It just proves that you can click a button 20 times. So let's all do what this server was introduced for and that would be alpha testing.
Jake7
on: 20 Aug 2011 [22:41]
lol nicely said.
+1
Locious
on: 20 Aug 2011 [22:51]
crimson i agree with what your saying, but wont bigger fights with more players be more like the actual servers to fing glitches that might not happen with only 4 players fighting... because i think thats like the average order size (2 players) so 2 orders fighting is only 4 players. should just have 2-3 huge orders
crimson
on: 21 Aug 2011 [00:19]
true, but there is no need for competition. On Alpha server, everyone should be working together to find glitches. and you can have big battles without orders too so the order does not really mean anything...
Klara2
on: 22 Aug 2011 [12:14]
schnitzer90, but warring is part of testing, isn't it? We're not going to find what combat-wise bugs and glitches are there until we start to fight. And to fight well we need to have/join orders and fight/destroy other orders.
It's a wargame, after all...
Klara2
on: 22 Aug 2011 [12:15]
updated: 22 Aug 2011 [12:16]
Crimson, without competition, there's no game...
Remember the glitches (I do) when we got thrown out of the game and had to re-login when huge armies fought on other servers? This is just an example... If we find the glitch here and you fix it effectively, the remedy can then be taken to Crusade or Grail or whatever...
And the list of such "war glitches" can be quite long
schnitzer90
Moderator
on: 22 Aug 2011 [22:55]
Klara2, Locious That is what's bothering me. There is no need to win a battle on this server, it was introduced for testing.
The one who "wins" on this server is the player who finds the most or the best hidden bugs and reports them to the developers.
I agree that there needs to be fights, even big ones.... But no need to care who is winning. Also, no need to push anything, I think everything that is meant to happen on this server will eventually happen.
crimson
on: 23 Aug 2011 [00:08]
Are you sure those were glitches? there are a few things you must consider before just jumping to calling it a glitch...
is the Alpha server supposed to be a "game"? No! The alpha server is there to "test" things, hence the name "test server".
controlled warring is, but warring to see who is better is chaotic and any small glitches would be overlooked in the heat of battle...
ibizafree
on: 27 Aug 2011 [03:37]
be competitive make more easy do new tests...when you fight against unbalaced armies ..is no useful..just an opinion...
thanks
lol nicely said.
We're not going to find what combat-wise bugs and glitches are there until we start to fight. And to fight well we need to have/join orders and fight/destroy other orders.
