| 1 2 »»» | |
|
amirdamti
|
What is the point play if I can't take over cities with out that the person who own the city accept to go to war.
I think that no logical person will accept war when he knows that his city can be taken nor do I , aseptically when he will check me out and know that I'm stronger then him. The is this rules starting to remind me more the application farm villa from facebook, just to grow more, when this suppose to be a war game and kingdoms. I do not see any point to play the game. Please correct me if I'm wrong. (or I'm missing the point of the game) |
| 1 2 »»» | |
|
Artemis Cahill
|
on: 11 Dec 2009 [04:24]
|
|
crimson
|
on: 11 Dec 2009 [05:43]
|
|
pekar
|
on: 11 Dec 2009 [23:33]
|
|
crimson
|
on: 12 Dec 2009 [02:16]
|
|
belletime
|
on: 13 Dec 2009 [18:39]
|
|
belletime
|
on: 13 Dec 2009 [18:39]
|
|
Artemis Cahill
|
on: 13 Dec 2009 [20:44]
|
|
djelectron
|
on: 14 Dec 2009 [01:25]
|
|
clayton92
|
on: 14 Dec 2009 [10:59]
|
|
pekar
|
on: 17 Dec 2009 [20:47]
|
|
TomiBullet
|
on: 17 Dec 2009 [22:35]
lol...then u must be realy sucssesfull person in ur real life... every single word in ur sentence is wrong... 1. u need to donate in ur library for ur first city...level 10 means shit. 2. u dont need to kill opponents army to take his city...his army can be 20times bigger then urs and u can take his city! 3. u dont go to the castle, capture it and city is urs lol...u need to captering it 24h...24h is enough time to let u know that u arent welcome there but whatever.... 4. 5. |
|
pekar
|
on: 18 Dec 2009 [23:18]
|
|
RileytheGreat
|
on: 19 Dec 2009 [03:50]
|
|
Artemis Cahill
|
on: 19 Dec 2009 [08:42]
|
|
TomiBullet
|
on: 19 Dec 2009 [11:09]
|
| 1 2 »»» | |
