««« 1 ... 3  4  5 »»»
clayton92
on: 20 Feb 2011 [02:28]
updated: 21 Feb 2011 [06:30]
Translate»
Defeat in Caerwent.

All your troops were defeated in city Caerwent. You lost: Archer 100, Horse Archer 20, Horseman 46, Scout 21, Norman Archer 26, Cart 1000, Ranger 20, Swordsman 177. You killed: Barbarian 2, Pikeman 6, Highwayman 21, Swordsman 1. Results of a fight in resources: not available.

thanks to dinabur and dedyka. atleast i know where i stand with them.

post your humiliating reports below! (:s11:)(:s11:)
««« 1 ... 3  4  5 »»»
shadowwarrior7
on: 15 Oct 2011 [05:44]
updated: 15 Oct 2011 [05:45]
All your troops were defeated in city abandoned mines. You lost: Teutonic knight 110, Horse Archer 300, Hero 3, Hospitaller Knight 30, Scout 6, Knight Templar 30, Pikeman 1428, Ranger 300, Knight 250, Archer 300, Man-at-arms 1160, Horseman 250, Marksman 300, Norman Archer 300, Royal Guard 200, Highwayman 200, Swordsman 5099. You killed: Slave 17361, Ranger 3, Swordsman 832.

Really bad mistake to fight in abandoned mines. The rocks there are lethal to an evasive strategy and I got caught in a bad shape. Destroyed within 5 minutes. Also had 2 other defeats that same day.(:s20:) Only thing that makes me feel better is that people have had worse than me
RuneScar
on: 08 Jul 2012 [16:56]
updated: 08 Jul 2012 [17:00]
Went to demolish English city.Cut down on wall by 100 archers.Lost all my troops Lost: 1 Hero
1 Scout
7 Pikemen

8 Swordsmen



I was cut down within TWENTY seconds of arriving.
deane
on: 10 Jul 2012 [01:26]
100 archers Vs 1 scout, 7 pikemen, 8 swordsman and 1 hero..:/

It's hardly surprising that you lost (:s3:)

You should get a shield first, like swordsman and pikemen, then get shooters like Rangers, so that your shield will block the enemy from shooting your shooters, so that they can shoot the enemy.
If that makes sense. (:s31:)(:s32:)
RuneScar
on: 10 Jul 2012 [16:59]
updated: 10 Jul 2012 [17:00]
It makes perfect sense,deane.I really got f(:s13:)d in that city.....(:s2:)
Jkljosiah
on: 11 Jul 2012 [20:50]
Deane speaks the truth, but I would recommend archers rather then rangers.
caymerra
on: 11 Jul 2012 [21:17]
why not both .
me101
on: 25 Jul 2012 [07:12]
I have lost my entire major army many times...
cooperzebulon
on: 10 Sep 2012 [04:31]
Results of campaign in XXXXXXXXX. You lost: Teutonic knight 11, Hospitaller Knight 15, Hero 2, Knight Templar 14, Swordbrother 153, Pikeman 302, Ranger 565, Knight 52, Barbarian 627, Man-at-arms 137, Archer 439, Horseman 107, Marksman 1110, Norman Archer 304, Swordsman 648. You killed: Dragon 251, Beast 931. You robbed: 0. Results of a fight in resources: not available.

That makes me sad. The battle report will not say who had those troops, either.
schnitzer90
Moderator
on: 10 Sep 2012 [13:51]
Quote cooperzebulon:
You killed: Dragon 251, Beast 931

(:s8:) (:s11:)
cooperzebulon
on: 15 Sep 2012 [19:53]
Okay, I will reveal this, I was in an adventure hut, so anyone could have been there.

Developer account playing a cruel joke? I don't know, but it is pretty funny... (:s31:)
RuneScar
on: 15 Oct 2012 [16:43]
All your troops were defeated in city (:s2:)Avelade. You lost: Man-at-arms 9, Hero 1, Pikeman 112, Cart 2, Knight 25, Swordsman 120. You killed: Pikeman 92, Swordsman 100, Knight 3. Results of a fight in resources: not available. (:s2:)(:s7:)

But I plan a very ''Pikey''* revenge.(:s12:)



*AKA.I'm going to massacre the remaining knights with pikemen.(:s12:)
RuneScar
on: 25 Nov 2012 [13:07]
Results of campaign in Barbarian Settlement. You lost: Man-at-arms 56, Horseman 4, Swordbrother 30, Slave 44, Knight 50. You killed: Barbarian 134. You robbed: 0. Results of a fight in resources: not available.

I managed to fend one barbarian army off ,but then they piled until about 8 or 9 armies sat there.Id say about 450 approx lost the final fight.I just wasn't expecting that much barbarians.My 2 heroes and 10 knight survived,gladly.
schnitzer90
Moderator
on: 25 Nov 2012 [13:44]
Quote RuneScar:
You lost: Man-at-arms 56, Horseman 4, Swordbrother 30, Slave 44, Knight 50.

Quote RuneScar:
My 2 heroes and 10 knight survived,gladly.

So you went to a barbarian settlement without any archers or generally ranged troops at all??? (:s32:) (:s14:)

Barbarians can only harm you once they are on the same spot as your army. So what you would want to do is attack (or in the best case defeat) them, before they even reach you!

Here is a suggestion for a similar expensive (population and mercenary points-wise) army that would do a lot better:
- 2 heroes
- 100 archers
- 100 marksmen
- 10 rangers
- 200 swordsmen / 150 barbarians

With that army, less barbarians would attack you, because you do not bring as much attack power with you. But even if it was the same amount that attacked you, if you were stading on a forest spot, you would kill most if not all defenders before they could harm you.
Ranged troops (not only the ones I mentioned above, but all types of them) is the key word, as much as your heroes can support. (:s1:)
RuneScar
on: 11 Dec 2012 [19:37]
Quote Gavin:
you guys suck lol, i have no 'battle reports' to be ashamed of


Oh really now?(:s17:)
me101
on: 12 Feb 2013 [05:52]
Results of campaign in Hospitaller Castle. You lost: Swordsman 1133. You killed: Hospitaller Knight 1567, Norman Archer 540. You robbed: 0. Results of a fight in resources: not available. I was in there for maybe 10 minutes before I had to retreat... (:s2:)
««« 1 ... 3  4  5 »»»